1- The margin of error was not in the story.
2- It didn’t say who was sponsoring the poll.
3- It didn’t say how many people were interviewed.
4- It didn’t say who was interviewed or if it was a random sampling.It didn’t say how the poll was conducted (telephone, computer, etc.)
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(78)
-
▼
October
(30)
- News values: A classic man-bites-dog story
- Links for copyeditors (and that would be us)
- Today's headline writing exercises
- Polls and surveys -- this one's better
- Looky, looky what Blogger can do!
- poll corrections
- Poll Analysis
- 5% Increase for Hilary!
- Poll Reveals Trib’s Disappointing Omission
- Polled in what direction?
- Tribs Errors
- Polls poles...
- What the poll?
- Polls, Polls, Polls
- Major Error Blown by the "Windy City" Tribune
- Punch Line Without Context
- Sample html
- Hyper-Link
- test
- Here is a fun link Check it out.
- !?<<<?I think I hate HTML./>>>/??
- Logging on.
- No trouble
- UMMM....YEAH
- W3C standards-based tutorial on HTML -- how cool a...
- Blog
- first post
- What's wrong with this poll?
- Hey Doc,I was able to get on the blogger with no p...
- Welcome to our comm207fall08 blog
-
▼
October
(30)
1 comment:
Good start. Why not go back into "Edit Post" and paste in a link ... just for the practice?
Post a Comment